Even Illinois county prosecutors have questions and concerns about the implementation of Illinois’ tough new drunk driving laws, that goes into effect in January ’09.

In this article, prosecutors are openly skeptical about whether or not this requirement for Breath Alchohol Ignition Interlock Devices, will curtail people from driving. The BAIID doesn’t allow a person’s car to start unless they blow into a device – essentially a rolling breathalyzer – and pass the test.

One of the primary concerns is whether this law will actually reduced incidents of drunk driving. Will the people who are the most dangerous and most likely to continue to drive after drinking actually abide by the restriction? A person could either simply not get the device installed (and obviously not have a valid license) or could still borrow a vehicle from another person.

The Interlock system creates a large bureaucracy around this law – and a significant profit center for BAIID installers and manufacterers, so it would be nice if everyone was confident it would help.

An additional concern raised by the DUI prosecutors in the article is the cost structure. Many courts have difficultly collecting fines and fees after DUI convictions as it is. There are numerous court fees and payments, including probation costs, that the court tries to collect.

Is this just setting poor and working class people up to fail? If a person absolutely has to drive to keep a job, does that mean he or she get an IID and skip paying court fees, that could result in a probation violation? Or do you skip the ignition interlock, and drive without one, risking a new criminal charge for that offense?

These concerns are legitimate, and everyone should be confident that the benefits of this new law will outweigh the costs and difficulties for the Illinois courts and our citizens.

—

Charged with drunk driving? For a free consultation on Illinois new DUI laws, please contact us today.

The new Illinois DUI law which goes into effect on Jan, 1 2009 will require an ignition interlock device to be installed on any vehicle used by a person convicted of a DUI in Illinois, even on a first offense. As one of the toughest DUI laws in the nation, this ignition interlock device requirement will replace the existing Judicial driving permit program.

The current judicial driving permit (JDP) allows those guilty of first offense DUI law violations to drive on a limited basis to work and other locations approved by a judge and the Illinois Dept of Transportation  (IDOT). The new program requires ignition interlock devices that prevent your vehicle from starting if you have consumed alcohol. It tests your breath for alcohol consumption with an attached mobile breathalyser, known as a ignition interlock device (IID). The former judicial driving permit will now be a monitoring device drivers permit.  If you have a monitoring device drivers permit, operating any vehicle without such a device will be a new criminal charge.

Ignition interlock devices are typically set to prevent your ignition from operating if it registers a .02% BAC. The legal limit for alcohol consumption is .08%. The devices will require occasional “rolling retests” to make  sure you don’t have a drink after successfully starting your car.

The new ignition interlock device requirement will be paid for by the offender. Costs estimates are about $200 for installation, and $100/month for maintenance, monitoring, and data reporting.

—

If you are facing a DUI charge in Illinois, please contact out defense attorneys for a free legal consultation and case evaluation. These new laws may change how you choose to respond to a charge of DUI in Illinois. The prospect of a required Ignition interlock device and restricted monitored driver’s permit could be a problem for many people who need to drive different vehicles to make a living. This may mean that you should consider fighting your DUI charges in some cases. Please contact us for help evaluating your defense options for an Illinois DUI charge.

A recent national drinking and driving survey stated that 16.5% of Illinois residents admitted to driving while “under the influence of alcohol”. The national average was 15.1%. The Midwest region tends to be the highest area of admitted drinking and driving.

Both numbers seem very high, which raises serious questions about how the survey was conducted, and how the question was asked. “Under the influence of alcohol” may mean very different things to different people. It could mean under the influence of a safely, reasonably, and legal amount of alcohol in many cases.

The survey didn’t specify legally impaired under the law. If the question had been asked “Have you committed a crime of DUI and gotten away with it” I’m sure the answers would have been different.

Is Illinois really a state where more than 15 out of 100 people are admitted lawbreakers?

Surveys like this are certainly good for business for MADD, crusading anti drug driving legislatures, and manufacturers of ignition interlock devices. But do they really help inform or protect the public, and does the result of the outcry actually reduce drunk driving rates?

—

For help with an Illinois DUI charge, please contact us for a case evaluation and free legal consultation.

Sheriffs deputies are commended for the most DUI arrests in McHenry county. On the surface, it certainly seems like a positive idea if the officers are simply vigorously and diligently enforcing the law. But it poses a number of interesting questions:

1. Are the arrests of the same quality? Do the people arrested get convicted at the same rates as those by officers who aren’t putting in these kinds of numbers? It it possible that these officers are simply arresting everyone, but maybe their arrests are only convicted at a 25% rate, whereas the overall rate is 75&. Those numbers are completely made up, but it would be interesting to know if many of these arrests are on weak evidence.
2. Are there financial incentives involved? Certainly the fees and fines collected are good for the state. Does the bonus money trickle down to the officers in the form of promotions, additional overtime, or more direct payments?

Police in southern Illinois are stepping up drunk driving enforcement and DUI patrols under a program known as Alcohol Countermeasure Enforcement or ACE patrols. Th program is partially funded by the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and the Department of Transportation.